Last verified
EFFICIENT GEMINI 4GEMINI 41M CONTEXT1M OUTPUT WITH LONG DECODEHALF PRICE TO NOV 30

Gemini 4 Argon API Pricing

Gemini 4 Argon is the model Google's price list calls its efficient Gemini 4 frontier reasoning model: the same rates as the more capable Gemini 4 Carbon, with faster responses and fewer thinking tokens per turn. It was announced on September 30, 2026 for trusted cyber defenders only and generally available on the Gemini API since October 13, 2026. It runs at an introductory $2.00/M input, $10.00/M output and $0.10/M cached input through November 30, 2026, then $4.00 / $20.00 / $0.20 from December 1. Batch, Flex and Priority double on the same date. One 1M-token window covers input, thinking and output. Checked by hand against Google's Gemini API pricing page.

Input - per 1M tokens
$2.00/M
$4.00 from Dec 1, 2026 -50%
Output - per 1M tokens
$10.00/M
$20.00 from Dec 1, 2026 -50%
Cached input - implicit only
$0.10/M
$0.20 from Dec 1, 2026 -95%
Effective - agentic blend
$1.21/M
92/8 split - 82% cache
§ 01 / TERMINAL

Gemini 4 Argon API cost calculator.

Live calculator on Google's introductory rate, which runs through November 30, 2026. Every figure here doubles on December 1, so run the numbers twice if the workload outlives this year.

$ /mo
Workload split
Prompt cache hit rate
Tokens you can process
—
Words equivalent (English)
—
Effective rate
—
Open full calculator (all models · share URL · CSV) →
§ 02 / SCENARIOS

Gemini 4 Argon cost on real workloads.

§ 03 / TOKENIZER

Gemini 4 Argon token counter and cost.

What's a token →
Estimate · gemini-tokenizer-estimate · ≈3.85 chars/token Auto-counts as you type

This is a chars-per-token approximation, not a real tokenizer. Actual tokens vary by language, code density, and tool-call overhead — counts are typically ±10–20% off for English prose, more for code or non-Latin scripts. For exact billing, use the vendor's official tokenizer.

Characters 738
Words 118
Tokens (estimated) 192 tokens
Cost as input · uncached $0.00038 USD
Cost as output · uncached $0.00192 USD
Cost as cached input $0.00002 USD
§ 04 / SHELF

Gemini 4 Argon vs similar models.

All models →
Model Input /M Output /M Effective blended Context Best for
Gemini 4 Argon Current $2.00 cache $0.10 $10.00 $1.21 agentic 92/8 1M Efficient Gemini 4 - fewer thinking tokens per turn
Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.75 cache $0.075 $3.75 $0.481 −2.5× · promo 1M Newest Gemini Flash - high volume at a fraction of the rate
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $2.00 cache $0.20 $12.00 $1.44 +20% 1M Google's Pro tier, still in preview
GPT-6.1 Sol $2.00 cache $0.10 $10.00 $1.29 +7% 1.05M Balanced GPT-6 for coding and agents
GPT-6 Astra $10.00 cache $1.00 $50.00 $6.82 +5.7× 1.05M OpenAI's top of stack
Claude Opus 5.5 $4.00 cache $0.20 $20.00 $2.58 +2.1× 1M Anthropic's general frontier
Muse Wonder $4.00 cache $0.20 $20.00 $2.41 +2.0× 1M Meta's most capable model, in preview
Gemini 4 Carbon $2.00 cache $0.10 $10.00 $1.21 same · promo 1M Google's most capable model, same rates
§ 05 / DEEP LINKS

Gemini 4 Argon cost by scenario.

All calculators →
§ 07 / BENCHMARKS

Gemini 4 Argon benchmarks

All benchmarks →

Gemini 4 Argon has published scores on 13 benchmarks we track, and leads 3 of them and shares first place on ARC-AGI-1. 3 of these scores come from an independent leaderboard; the rest are the lab's own reports.

Benchmark Score Rank Leader Source
ARC-AGI-1 Reasoning 98.5% ARC Prize verified, best result #1 of 99 Tied for first with 5 more Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation
DeepSWE Coding 77.9% as reported #1 of 27 Gemini 4 Argon leads Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
ARC-AGI-2 Reasoning 91.3% ARC Prize verified, best result #5 of 105 GPT-6 Astra · 95% Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation
ARC-AGI-3 Reasoning · Standard harness 49.8% ARC Prize verified, best result #3 of 24 GPT-6 Astra · 62.7% Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation
PostTrainBench AI research 45.3% as reported #1 of 6 Gemini 4 Argon leads Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
Agents' Last Exam Agents and computer use · Strict pass rate 39.5% pass rate #1 of 5 Gemini 4 Argon leads Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
Terminal-Bench 4.0 Agents and computer use 57.4% as reported #8 of 34 Kimi K3.1 Pro · 65.7% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark Professional work 19.6% as reported #2 of 7 Kimi K3.1 Pro · 23.7% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
AutomationBench Agents and computer use · Main set (as reported) 51.3% as reported #7 of 22 MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 62.8% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
OSWorld 2 Agents and computer use · 2.0, offline subset, partial score 69.2% offline subset, partial score #3 of 7 GPT-6 Astra · 73.5% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
Terminal-Bench-Science AI research 57.6% as reported #6 of 12 Claude Mythos 5.2 · 75.3% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
Chartography Vision and documents · Tool use not stated 71.6% tool use not stated #2 of 2 Gemini 4 Carbon · 72.5% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind
FrontierSWE Coding · FrontierSWE v2 55% as reported #3 of 3 Claude Fable 5.2 · 69.9% Vendor-reported Google DeepMind

Gemini 4 Argon API pricing FAQ.

What Gemini 4 Argon costs now and after November 30, which tiers Google publishes, and how it compares with the other frontier models.

Q · 01 How much does Gemini 4 Argon cost? +
Google lists $2.00/M input, $10.00/M output (thinking tokens included) and $0.10/M cached input through November 30, 2026. Under this site's 92/8 agentic blend at an 82% cache-hit rate that is $1.21/M effective. There is no long-context tier: one rate across the whole window.
Q · 02 What changes on December 1, 2026? +
Every token rate doubles: input to $4.00, output to $20.00 and cached input to $0.20 per million, the card Google's launch post first gave as the price after the introductory period. Batch, Flex and Priority double on the same date. This page stores the rate in force today and will record the change when it happens; until then it shows both.
Q · 03 Can I use Gemini 4 Argon through the API today? +
Yes, since October 13, 2026, as gemini-4-argon on the paid tier of the Gemini API. Google's pricing page says it is not available on the Free tier or on the Google AI Pro plan. From the September 30 announcement until then, only trusted cyber defenders in Google's Fairwind Program could use it.
Q · 04 What is the context window? +
One unified window of 1,048,576 tokens shared by input, thinking and output. A synchronous call returns up to 65,536 output tokens by default; with long decode and background execution a single response can run up to 1M tokens minus the input, generated in hops of up to 64K. All of it bills at the output rate, the highest on the card, so cap max_output_tokens on long jobs.
Q · 05 Are there Batch, Flex or Priority rates? +
Yes, all three. Batch and Flex are half of Standard: $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output. Priority is 1.8x Standard, $3.60/M input and $18.00/M output through November 30, 2026. Caching is implicit only: Google does not support explicit context caching on Argon, so there is no cache-storage charge.
Q · 06 How does Argon compare on price with GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder? +
Under this site's blend Argon works out to $1.21/M, against $1.29/M for GPT-6.1 Sol and $2.58/M for Claude Opus 5.5. Through November 30, 2026 Argon's input, output and cached rates equal GPT-6.1 Sol's; from December 1 they equal those of Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder.
Q · 07 What does Google say Argon is good at? +
Google's launch figures: state of the art on DeepSWE v1.1 (77.9%) for long-horizon software engineering, first on the Vals Index and on Zapier's AutomationBench (51.3%), 91.7% on LVBench for long-video understanding, and tied first on CWE-bench v1 (68%) for patching vulnerabilities. These are Google's own numbers from the announcement, not independent runs.
Q · 08 Should I use Argon or Gemini 3.8 Flash? +
Both are on dated introductory schedules, so compare them on the same footing. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output until its rates double on January 1, 2027. Argon is the Gemini 4 model for coding and agent work at speed, with Gemini 4 Carbon above it for the hardest problems at the same rates; Flash is the one for volume.