Devstral 2 API Pricing
Devstral 2 is retired. Mistral publishes a retirement date of July 31, 2026 for DEVSTRAL-2512 and names Mistral Medium 3.5 as the alternative; the model is absent from both the live catalogue and the API pricing page (checked August 23, 2026). This archive preserves the last published card: $0.4/M input and $2/M output, 256K context, no cache SKU.
Devstral 2 API cost calculator.
Calculator pre-loaded with Devstral 2 rates. Tweak spend, output mix, or cache hit rate to compare this model with nearby alternatives.
Devstral 2 cost on real workloads.
Repo-wide bug fix
Reading 100-page contracts
Support agent ticket triage
Research planning turn
Counts use a chars-per-token calibration measured on the vendor's own published tokenizer (mistralai/Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407, 2026-06-10). English prose is typically within a few percent; code and non-Latin scripts tokenize heavier. For billing-exact counts use the vendor's count-tokens API.
| Model | Input /M | Output /M | Effective blended | Context | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devstral 2 Current | $0.40 | $2.00 | $0.528 agentic 92/8 | documented elsewhere — not on pricing page | Coding and software agents |
| Mistral Large 3 | $0.50 cache $0.05 | $1.50 | $0.241 −2.2× | documented elsewhere — not on pricing page | Open-weight multimodal work |
| Mistral Small 4 | $0.15 cache $0.015 | $0.60 | $0.0842 −6.3× | 256K | Low-cost Mistral workloads |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | $1.50 cache $0.15 | $7.50 | $0.962 +82% | documented elsewhere — not on pricing page | Agentic and coding workloads |
| GPT-6.1 Terra | $1.00 cache $0.05 | $5.00 | $0.645 +22% | 1.05M | OpenAI's fast, efficient GPT-6 tier |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $2.00 cache $0.10 | $10.00 | $1.29 +2.4× | 1M | Anthropic's current Sonnet |
By comparison
Devstral 2 API pricing FAQ.
Short answers for teams checking Devstral 2 pricing, status, and migration choices.
Q · 01 Is Devstral 2 still available? +
Q · 02 How much does Devstral 2 cost? +
Q · 03 Is cached-input pricing included? +
Q · 04 What should teams compare it against? +
current same-provider models.