Last verified
PREVIOUS KIMI FLAGSHIP1M CONTEXTTEXT + VISION + VIDEOALWAYS-ON THINKINGPROMPT CACHING

Kimi K3 API Pricing

Kimi K3 was Moonshot's flagship for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work from July to October 2026, and the first Kimi model to carry a full 1M-token context window. Since October 24 that place belongs to Kimi K3.1 Pro, a post-trained K3 a third cheaper on every rate; K3 stays on the price list. The live Kimi pricing surface lists $3/M input and $15/M output, with cache hits at $0.30/M — roughly three times the input price of the K2 family it sits above. Thinking mode is always on, so output tokens include reasoning. Checked by hand against platform.kimi.ai.

Input - per 1M tokens
$3.00/M
Source Kimi API new
Output - per 1M tokens
$15.00/M
Context 1M new
Cached input - per 1M tokens
$0.30/M
Cache automatic -90%
Effective - agentic blend
$1.92/M
92/8 split - 82% cache
§ 01 / TERMINAL

Kimi K3 API cost calculator.

Live calculator pre-loaded with current Kimi K3 rates. Tweak spend, output mix, or cache assumptions and share the URL to share the calculation.

$ /mo
Workload split
Prompt cache hit rate
Tokens you can process
—
Words equivalent (English)
—
Effective rate
—
Open full calculator (all models · share URL · CSV) →
§ 02 / SCENARIOS

Kimi K3 cost on real workloads.

§ 03 / TOKENIZER

Kimi K3 token counter and cost.

What's a token →
Estimate · moonshot-tokenizer-estimate · ≈3.85 chars/token Auto-counts as you type

This is a chars-per-token approximation, not a real tokenizer. Actual tokens vary by language, code density, and tool-call overhead — counts are typically ±10–20% off for English prose, more for code or non-Latin scripts. For exact billing, use the vendor's official tokenizer.

Characters 733
Words 111
Tokens (estimated) 190 tokens
Cost as input · uncached $0.00057 USD
Cost as output · uncached $0.00285 USD
Cost as cached input $0.00006 USD
§ 04 / SHELF

Kimi K3 vs similar models.

All models →
Model Input /M Output /M Effective blended Context Best for
Kimi K3 Current $3.00 cache $0.30 $15.00 $1.92 agentic 92/8 1M Frontier Kimi agents - 1M context
Kimi K3.1 Pro $2.00 cache $0.20 $10.00 $1.28 −33% 1M Dedicated Kimi coding work
Claude Opus 4.8 $5.00 cache $0.50 $25.00 $3.41 +77% 1M Frontier coding - long-form writing
GPT-5.5 $5.00 cache $0.50 $30.00 $3.61 +87% 1M Frontier OpenAI reasoning
Gemini 3.8 Flash $0.75 cache $0.075 $3.75 $0.481 −4.0× · promo 1M Long-context multimodal work
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.30 cache $0.006 $1.20 $0.15 −13× 1M Budget reasoning and coding
§ 07 / BENCHMARKS

Kimi K3 benchmarks

All benchmarks →

Kimi K3 has published scores on 17 benchmarks we track, and leads 2 of them. 2 of these scores come from an independent leaderboard; the rest are the lab's own reports.

Benchmark Score Rank Leader Source
OSWorld-Verified Agents and computer use 84.8% max effort #1 of 8 Kimi K3 leads Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
ARC-AGI-1 Reasoning 94.5% ARC Prize verified, best result #19 of 99 6 tied · 98.5% Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation
FrontierSWE Coding · Version not stated 81.2% max effort #1 of 5 Kimi K3 leads Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
Toolathlon Agents and computer use 76.5% max effort #2 of 9 MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 76.9% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
Terminal-Bench 2 Agents and computer use · Terminal-Bench 2.1 88.3% max effort #4 of 17 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 90.6% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
ARC-AGI-2 Reasoning 60.4% ARC Prize verified, best result #35 of 105 GPT-6 Astra · 95% Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation
CharXiv Reasoning Vision and documents · No tools 84.8% max effort, no tools #4 of 9 Kimi K3.1 Pro · 89% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
GPQA Diamond Expert knowledge 93.5% max effort #5 of 11 GPT-6 Astra · 96% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
DeepSWE Coding 67.5% max effort #13 of 27 Gemini 4 Argon · 77.9% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
BrowseComp Agents and computer use 91.2% max effort #3 of 6 Kimi K3.1 Pro · 92.1% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
JobBench Professional work 54.3% max effort #3 of 5 MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 62% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
Humanity's Last Exam Expert knowledge · With tools 56% max effort, with tools #13 of 20 Claude Fable 5.2 · 74.2% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
APEX-Agents Professional work 41% max effort #4 of 6 Kimi K3.1 Pro · 69.4% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
AutomationBench Agents and computer use · Public 600-task set 30.8% max effort #2 of 3 DeepSeek V4 Pro · 31.8% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
PostTrainBench AI research 36.6% max effort #4 of 6 Gemini 4 Argon · 45.3% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
Agents' Last Exam Agents and computer use · Split not stated 28.3% max effort, split not stated #3 of 4 MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 31.6% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI
OSWorld 2 Agents and computer use · 2.0, scoring not stated 58.3% max effort, scoring not stated #2 of 2 MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 61.7% Vendor-reported Moonshot AI

Kimi K3 API pricing FAQ.

Practical pricing questions, separated from calculator assumptions and regional taxes.

Q · 01 What is Kimi K3 priced at? +
Moonshot's pricing page lists $3.00/M cache-miss input, $0.30/M cache-hit input and $15.00/M output, for a 1,048,576-token context window. Under AI//COST's 92/8 agentic blend with 82% cache hits, the effective planning figure is $1.92/M. Prices exclude local taxes, which the vendor calculates at checkout.
Q · 02 Should I use Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro? +
Kimi K3.1 Pro, unless you have a reason to pin K3. Moonshot describes K3.1 Pro as a post-trained K3, it is a third cheaper on every rate - $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output against $3.00 and $15.00 - and Moonshot's model list now calls K3 its previous-generation flagship. K3 has no deprecation date.
Q · 03 Has Moonshot officially announced Kimi K3? +
Yes. When this page first went up on July 16, 2026 the rates were live on platform.kimi.ai with no launch post behind them, so we published them as vendor-listed but pre-announcement. Moonshot has since published the launch post on kimi.com/blog, put a launch banner across the API docs, and made K3 the flagship on moonshot.ai, which describes it as a 2.8T-parameter natively multimodal model. Re-verified on July 28, 2026: the prices did not change with the announcement.
Q · 04 Why is Kimi K3 so much more expensive than Kimi K2.6? +
K3 costs roughly 3× more on input ($3/M vs $0.95/M) and 3.75× more on output ($15/M vs $4/M). On our agentic blend that is $1.92/M effective against $0.60/M for K2.6. If your workload does not need the 1M context window or K3's reasoning depth, Kimi K2.6 remains substantially cheaper.
Q · 05 How does prompt caching work? +
Automatically, with a price on the write. Kimi writes eligible request prefixes to its cache with a 5-minute TTL unless you ask for 1 hour (prompt_cache_options on Chat Completions and Responses, top-level cache_control on the Anthropic-compatible Messages API, which only writes when you set it). Since September 2026 the card bills the write as its own line - $3.00/M for 5 minutes, $6.00/M for 1 hour - and Moonshot says that is not a price increase: the write replaces the input charge on the part that missed, so a default request costs what it did. Cache hits are billed at $0.30/M instead of $3/M, a 90% discount, and the calculator's default agentic blend assumes an 82% cache-hit rate. The 1-hour TTL pays for itself after two hits within the hour.
Q · 06 How is the effective price calculated? +
AI//COST uses the same 92/8 agentic blend everywhere: 92% of tokens are input, 82% of which are served from cache. For Kimi K3 that gives a blended input of $0.786/M and an effective blended cost of $1.92/M. The same formula is applied to every model in the shelf above, so the numbers are directly comparable.
Q · 07 Does thinking mode change what I pay? +
Yes, indirectly. K3 always has thinking mode enabled and currently only supports reasoning_effort: max, so reasoning tokens are billed as output at $15/M. There is no cheaper non-thinking variant of K3, unlike the K2 family. Output-heavy workloads will feel this more than input-heavy ones.
Q · 08 Does this include image and video input? +
Kimi K3 is documented with native visual understanding and accepts text, image, and video input. The pricing page bills consumed tokens, so extracted document, image, or video context should be treated as model input once passed into a request.
Q · 09 How accurate is the tokenizer estimate? +
The browser widget uses a moonshot-tokenizer-estimate chars-per-token estimate for English text. Actual billing comes from Kimi API usage fields and can differ for Chinese, code, images, video, or mixed-language prompts.