Kimi K3 API Pricing
Kimi K3 was Moonshot's flagship for long-horizon coding and end-to-end knowledge work from July to October 2026, and the first Kimi model to carry a full 1M-token context window. Since October 24 that place belongs to Kimi K3.1 Pro, a post-trained K3 a third cheaper on every rate; K3 stays on the price list. The live Kimi pricing surface lists $3/M input and $15/M output, with cache hits at $0.30/M — roughly three times the input price of the K2 family it sits above. Thinking mode is always on, so output tokens include reasoning. Checked by hand against platform.kimi.ai.
Kimi K3 API cost calculator.
Live calculator pre-loaded with current Kimi K3 rates. Tweak spend, output mix, or cache assumptions and share the URL to share the calculation.
Kimi K3 cost on real workloads.
Codebase-scale migration
Reading 100-page contracts
Ticket triage
Research planning turn
This is a chars-per-token approximation, not a real tokenizer. Actual tokens vary by language, code density, and tool-call overhead — counts are typically ±10–20% off for English prose, more for code or non-Latin scripts. For exact billing, use the vendor's official tokenizer.
| Model | Input /M | Output /M | Effective blended | Context | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3 Current | $3.00 cache $0.30 | $15.00 | $1.92 agentic 92/8 | 1M | Frontier Kimi agents - 1M context |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | $2.00 cache $0.20 | $10.00 | $1.28 −33% | 1M | Dedicated Kimi coding work |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | $5.00 cache $0.50 | $25.00 | $3.41 +77% | 1M | Frontier coding - long-form writing |
| GPT-5.5 | $5.00 cache $0.50 | $30.00 | $3.61 +87% | 1M | Frontier OpenAI reasoning |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | $0.75 cache $0.075 | $3.75 | $0.481 −4.0× · promo | 1M | Long-context multimodal work |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.30 cache $0.006 | $1.20 | $0.15 −13× | 1M | Budget reasoning and coding |
Kimi K3 has published scores on 17 benchmarks we track, and leads 2 of them. 2 of these scores come from an independent leaderboard; the rest are the lab's own reports.
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Leader | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld-Verified Agents and computer use | 84.8% max effort | #1 of 8 | Kimi K3 leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| ARC-AGI-1 Reasoning | 94.5% ARC Prize verified, best result | #19 of 99 | 6 tied · 98.5% | Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation |
| FrontierSWE Coding · Version not stated | 81.2% max effort | #1 of 5 | Kimi K3 leads | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Toolathlon Agents and computer use | 76.5% max effort | #2 of 9 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 76.9% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Terminal-Bench 2 Agents and computer use · Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 88.3% max effort | #4 of 17 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 90.6% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| ARC-AGI-2 Reasoning | 60.4% ARC Prize verified, best result | #35 of 105 | GPT-6 Astra · 95% | Official leaderboard ARC Prize Foundation |
| CharXiv Reasoning Vision and documents · No tools | 84.8% max effort, no tools | #4 of 9 | Kimi K3.1 Pro · 89% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| GPQA Diamond Expert knowledge | 93.5% max effort | #5 of 11 | GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| DeepSWE Coding | 67.5% max effort | #13 of 27 | Gemini 4 Argon · 77.9% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| BrowseComp Agents and computer use | 91.2% max effort | #3 of 6 | Kimi K3.1 Pro · 92.1% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| JobBench Professional work | 54.3% max effort | #3 of 5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 62% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Humanity's Last Exam Expert knowledge · With tools | 56% max effort, with tools | #13 of 20 | Claude Fable 5.2 · 74.2% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| APEX-Agents Professional work | 41% max effort | #4 of 6 | Kimi K3.1 Pro · 69.4% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| AutomationBench Agents and computer use · Public 600-task set | 30.8% max effort | #2 of 3 | DeepSeek V4 Pro · 31.8% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| PostTrainBench AI research | 36.6% max effort | #4 of 6 | Gemini 4 Argon · 45.3% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| Agents' Last Exam Agents and computer use · Split not stated | 28.3% max effort, split not stated | #3 of 4 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 31.6% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
| OSWorld 2 Agents and computer use · 2.0, scoring not stated | 58.3% max effort, scoring not stated | #2 of 2 | MiniMax M3.1 Flash · 61.7% | Vendor-reported Moonshot AI |
Kimi K3 API pricing FAQ.
Practical pricing questions, separated from calculator assumptions and regional taxes.
Q · 01 What is Kimi K3 priced at? +
$3.00/M cache-miss input, $0.30/M cache-hit input and $15.00/M output, for a 1,048,576-token context window. Under AI//COST's 92/8 agentic blend with 82% cache hits, the effective planning figure is $1.92/M. Prices exclude local taxes, which the vendor calculates at checkout.Q · 02 Should I use Kimi K3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro? +
$2.00/M input and $10.00/M output against $3.00 and $15.00 - and Moonshot's model list now calls K3 its previous-generation flagship. K3 has no deprecation date.Q · 03 Has Moonshot officially announced Kimi K3? +
platform.kimi.ai with no launch post behind them, so we published them as vendor-listed but pre-announcement. Moonshot has since published the launch post on kimi.com/blog, put a launch banner across the API docs, and made K3 the flagship on moonshot.ai, which describes it as a 2.8T-parameter natively multimodal model. Re-verified on July 28, 2026: the prices did not change with the announcement.Q · 04 Why is Kimi K3 so much more expensive than Kimi K2.6? +
3× more on input ($3/M vs $0.95/M) and 3.75× more on output ($15/M vs $4/M). On our agentic blend that is $1.92/M effective against $0.60/M for K2.6. If your workload does not need the 1M context window or K3's reasoning depth, Kimi K2.6 remains substantially cheaper.Q · 05 How does prompt caching work? +
prompt_cache_options on Chat Completions and Responses, top-level cache_control on the Anthropic-compatible Messages API, which only writes when you set it). Since September 2026 the card bills the write as its own line - $3.00/M for 5 minutes, $6.00/M for 1 hour - and Moonshot says that is not a price increase: the write replaces the input charge on the part that missed, so a default request costs what it did. Cache hits are billed at $0.30/M instead of $3/M, a 90% discount, and the calculator's default agentic blend assumes an 82% cache-hit rate. The 1-hour TTL pays for itself after two hits within the hour.Q · 06 How is the effective price calculated? +
$0.786/M and an effective blended cost of $1.92/M. The same formula is applied to every model in the shelf above, so the numbers are directly comparable.Q · 07 Does thinking mode change what I pay? +
reasoning_effort: max, so reasoning tokens are billed as output at $15/M. There is no cheaper non-thinking variant of K3, unlike the K2 family. Output-heavy workloads will feel this more than input-heavy ones.Q · 08 Does this include image and video input? +
Q · 09 How accurate is the tokenizer estimate? +
moonshot-tokenizer-estimate chars-per-token estimate for English text. Actual billing comes from Kimi API usage fields and can differ for Chinese, code, images, video, or mixed-language prompts.